Over the past day or two, I’ve been following a thread on IMDB under “Open Season’s” forum thread at http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0400717/board/thread/54564402 that has been rather stimulating debate between hunters and vegans. So far the vegans haven’t shown a compelling argument other than that they feel it’s wrong to take any life, neglecting all the while that plants are life as well. The majority of their arguments so far are either opinion and/or erroneous facts. Here’s one I thought was really well spoken on the hunter side:
“The arguments of the anti-hunter are completely without merit. They are based strictly on an emotional, kneejerk reaction to something they do not understand. Something they would never take the time to research and actually make a decision based on logic and reasoning. They do not deal in facts. Their perspective is extremely narrow. Unfortunately, they also tend to have the loudest voice, even though they are in the tiny minority.
The facts are:
We are not aliens. We evolved on this planet and we are its top predator. Our eyes are in the front for a reason. We should act like it. We have domain over every other living creature on this planet. We have also evolved an intelligence and a sense of awareness not present in other animals. It is our responsibility to care for and protect them. To NOT hunt is to deny our place in the cycle of life on earth. To NOT preserve their habitat is to deny them a place to live. To NOT keep their numbers controlled, is to allow them to die off in large masses from disease and starvation. This is NOT in their best interests.
Hunters spend more money and put more effort every year towards conservation and wildlife preservation than anybody else, by a HUGE margin. Hunting pays for your state parks, wildlife management areas, etc.
In Africa, if there was not the big hunting industry, there would be no lions, elephants, rhinos, hippos, leopards, cheetahs, warthogs or the many species of antelope. The revenue from the hunting industry is what preserves these species and their habitat. It is what pays for their game managment departments, those responsible for controlling poaching. In many places, it is the only source of revenue. It is the only way the land can generate revenue AND the wild game be allowed to live there. A very nice coexistence. It is also a huge boon to the local villagers because they receive all the meat. And yes, make no mistake, NOTHING is wasted. No meat is allowed to be exported from Africa. You may judge it negatively as ‘trophy’ or ‘sport’ hunting. But to do so is to ignore the truth and the grand scope of it. Do your research.
Those are facts, here’s some opinion:
Hunting is a part of our American heritage and our history as an evolving race. Civizilations were built on the backs of animals. Man has been kept warm by their hides and their bellies full with their meat. Without hunting, WE would not be here. To deny that history and heritage because it is convenient for YOU and makes YOU feel better is about the most selfish thing a person can do. It is extremely narrow minded and if anti-hunters have their way, they will only be pleased with the result in the short term.
The biggest threat wildlife faces is not the rifle, bow or pistol of the hunter, it is the bulldozer, the dump truck, the housing development and the shopping mall. The uncontrolled development that is so prevalent in many places is FAR more cruel than hunting could ever be. Yet people have no hesitation in moving to another brand new housing development or condominium. As they sit on freshly destroyed woodlands and preach about ‘saving animals’. Hypocracy!
The sickest part is how they assess value to animal life based on ‘cuteness’. It’s OK to kill birds and pests but not those cute bunny-rabbits! Not Bambi! Hypocracy. I, for one, do not draw those lines. I have an immeasurable amount of respect for our wildlife. More, I dare say, than your average tree-hugger. A rabbit’s life is not more precious to me than a snake’s. Alligators are not detested while Bambi is to be adored. To make such judgements on the value of an animal’s life while standing under the flag of activism is just sickening. What is even more sickening is how they use the term ‘murder’. To somehow equate the life of a human to that of an animal, THAT is a mental disorder.”
-newfrontier45